Strategic Innovation & Marketing ACCELERATORS

What innovation types fit your cognitive style?

What innovation types fit your cognitive style?

A new year is always a new beginning in business and in innovation. In the coming months, many companies will start new innovation project initiatives. They will compose innovation teams assigned to work on specified innovation challenges, such as creating an innovative product, designing a better customer experience, exploring new distribution channels, or designing impactful promotional campaigns, among others. We can distinguish the nature of such innovation project cases by a) the underlying innovation type and b) the desired impact of the innovative change they seek to produce. But did you know that people’s enjoyment of, and performance in, a particular innovation project depends on their preferred cognitive styles and innovator profile? Today, let’s explore what TIPS innovator types tend to fit to what kind of innovation types.

Introducing the TIPS innovation profiling method

TIPS is a new innovation people profiling method that I created for my innovation company Thinkergy. The method helps people to identify which of the four TIPS bases (Theories, Ideas, People, Systems) they are naturally attracted to, and also determines their preferred styles to think, work, interact and live.

Based on the online test results, a person is assigned one of 11 TIPS innovator profiles that fall into three categories:: four pure profiles that rest on one base (Theorist, Ideator, Partner, Systematizer); six dual profiles that play on two bases (Conceptualizer, Promoter, Organizer, Technocrat, Coach and Experimenter); and one multiple profile (All-Rounder) that balances all bases. 

Introducing the spectrum of modern innovation types

In the past, innovation mostly focused on only two innovation types (product innovation, process innovation), but in the last 2 decades, a wide spectrum of modern innovation types has emerged that allows companies to innovate in many different ways:

  • Operational innovations target to improve internal processes and operational structures. The related innovation types are process innovation and structure innovation.
  • Value innovations focus on producing new, original and —in particular— meaningful value propositions (products, services, solutions, customer experiences and dreams (or as Tom Peters calls them, experiences plus)). Innovation types that target new value creation are product innovation (sometimes also called new product development), service innovation, solution design, and customer experience design.
  • Leverage innovations fall into two categories that are led by different bases: 
    • Innovation types that leverage through multiplication allow you to multiply the impact —and revenues— of an innovative value through new distribution channels, new platforms, networks and strategic partnerships, and innovative business models. Related innovation types are channel innovation, platform and network innovation, and business model innovation.
    • In contrast, innovation types that leverage through magnification aim to make an innovative value offering appear to be even more valuable through a strong brand and exclusive image, thus allowing for higher prices and profit margins. Innovation types that enhance value through design include brand design, image campaign and promotion design, and packaging design.
  • Strategy innovation aims to reposition a business for sustainable and superior growth by working on all previous four levels (superior new value offerings produced at lower operational cost and leveraged with modern channels and design).
  • Finally, social innovation aims to improve the lot of the less fortunate members of society and the environment.

Larry Keeley discusses ten innovation types in a book titled The Ten Types of Innovation. In an earlier blog article, I expanded on Keeley’s ten innovation types and categorised them as described above. In this connection, please note that before you start a new innovation project targeting a particular innovation type, you should be aware that you have to follow certain application rules of the innovation types game. 

How the different innovation types relate to TIPS

Dependent on your TIPS innovator profile, and your related dominant base or bases, you tend to relish certain innovation types more than others, and are likely to perform well in these innovation project that cater to your TIPS “home base”:

  • Operational innovations are largely Systems-driven. If you’re profiled as a Systematizer, Organizer, Technocrat or Systematic Experimenter, you’re likely to enjoy working on innovation projects targeting internal processes and operational structure.
  • Value innovations are dominated by the profiles at the Ideas-base. Ideators, Conceptualizers, Promoters and Imaginative Experimenters dominate innovation projects that aim to create meaningful new products, services, solutions and experiences that delight customers.
  • Theories-based profile types (Theorists, Conceptualizers, Technocrats, and —to a lesser extent— Systematizers) appreciate if they can apply their quantitative-conceptual cognitive style to innovation types that leverage through multiplication (focusing on new channels, networks, platforms, and business models).
  • In contrast, innovation types that leverage through magnification (brand, campaign, promotion and packaging design) are often driven by the profiles at the Ideas- and People-base (Promoters, Ideators, and Partners). Strategy innovation projects are spearheaded by the conceptual profiles at the TIPS bases Theories and Ideas (in particular Conceptualizers, but also Theorists and Ideators).
  • Finally, the profiles surrounding the People-base (Partners, Promoters, Organizers and Coaches) love working on social innovation initiatives. 

How innovations differ in their impact of change

The TIPS bases help explain not only what types of projects the different TIPS innovator profiles enjoy working on, but also the degree of change that they naturally prefer. Innovation equates to a positive change and a departure from the status quo. Thereby, different innovations vary in the degree of positive change that they produce. 

We can categorize innovations into three different intensity levels based on the impact that a change has: incremental improvements (typically of an existing product marketed to an existing user base), evolutionary innovations and revolutionary innovations (disruptive new products allowing a firm to wow existing users and convert new customers). Moreover, evolutionary innovations can be further differentiated as to whether they focus on adding new value to existing users, or if they extend an existing value offering to new customer groups. These differences can be mapped out in an innovation-impact type matrix that is shown below. 

How much change do innovators at the four TIPS bases prefer to produce?

Depending on their dominant TIPS base, different innovator types feel comfortable with —and prefer to produce in an innovation project— a certain degree of innovative change:

  • The innovator profiles at the Systems-base (Systematizer, Organizer, Technocrat and Systematic Experimenter) tend to focus more on Incremental improvements by practicing a more adaptive innovation style. They are satisfied with incremental change because in general, they prefer preserving the status quo.
  • In contrast, the dynamic innovator profiles surrounding the TIPS base Ideas (Ideator, Conceptualizer, Promoter and Imaginative Experimenter) like to drive bold, radical change. They really enjoy pushing for revolutionary change and creating disruptive innovations, which they find more exciting than satisfying with an evolutionary innovation or —how boring— wasting their time and creative zest in projects targeting only incremental improvements.
  • Finally, the profiles at the Theories- and People-base can support either the incremental innovation efforts at the Systems-base or the more revolutionary innovation projects of the Ideas-base. But what they really enjoy most is working on projects targeting evolutionary innovations. Thereby, the profiles surrounding the Theories-base prefer to create more and new value to existing users, while the innovator profiles surrounding the People-base enjoy looking for novel ways to extend existing value offerings to new user groups. 

Conclusion: Before you start a new innovation initiative, determine a) what innovation type the project focuses on, and b) how much change you target. Then, assign a person with a suitable innovator profile to lead the innovation initiative. Finally, invite those people to join the innovation project team who naturally enjoy this type of project based on their TIPS innovator profile, base orientation and related cognitive styles.

Are you interested in determining your personal TIPS innovator profile? Or would you like to learn more about how to apply TIPS in business and innovation in an experiential TIPS training course, The TIPS Innovation Profiling Workshop? Contact us and let us know more about how we may support you.

© Dr. Detlef Reis 2018

15 comments (Add your own)

1. wrote:
Thank you for every other informative web site.
Where else could I am getting that kind of information written in such a perfect manner?
I have a challenge that I am just now running on, and I have been at
the glance out for such information.

Mon, May 6, 2019 @ 6:11 PM

2. wrote:
I like the valuable info you provide in your articles. I'll bookmark your blog and check
again here frequently. I am quite sure I will learn a lot of new stuff right
here! Best of luck for the next!

Sun, May 12, 2019 @ 1:29 AM

3. wrote:
What i do not realize is in truth how you are now not
actually a lot more well-liked than you may be now.

You're very intelligent. You understand thus significantly with regards to this subject, produced me personally consider it
from a lot of various angles. Its like women and men aren't fascinated until it is one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga!
Your personal stuffs outstanding. Always care
for it up!

Sun, June 23, 2019 @ 6:55 AM

4. wrote:
Whats up very nice website!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Superb
.. I'll bookmark your blog and take the feeds additionally?

I'm satisfied to find so many useful information here within the publish, we'd
like work out extra strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing.

. . . . .

Fri, June 28, 2019 @ 4:30 PM

5. wrote:
What i do not understood is in fact how you're
no longer really a lot more neatly-preferred
than you may be right now. You're so intelligent. You understand therefore considerably in terms of this topic, made me in my view imagine it from so many various angles.
Its like women and men are not interested until it's one thing to accomplish with Girl gaga!
Your individual stuffs outstanding. All the time deal with it up!
natalielise pof

Wed, July 31, 2019 @ 10:39 PM

6. wrote:
Thanks for sharing your info. I truly appreciate your efforts and
I will be waiting for your next write ups thanks once again.

Tue, August 13, 2019 @ 7:31 PM

7. wrote:
For latest information you have to pay a visit world wide web and on web I found
this web page as a finest web site for most up-to-date updates.

Wed, August 14, 2019 @ 5:18 PM

8. wrote:
Hi there friends, its enormous post on the topic of tutoringand fully explained, keep
it up all the time.

Sun, September 1, 2019 @ 1:53 PM

9. wrote:
Great work! This is the type of info that are supposed
to be shared around the web. Shame on Google for now not positioning this put up upper!
Come on over and talk over with my web site . Thanks =)

Sun, November 17, 2019 @ 8:33 AM

10. wrote:
I think everything published made a ton of sense.
However, what about this? suppose you were to create a awesome headline?

I mean, I don't want to tell you how to run your blog,
however what if you added a post title that makes people desire more?
I mean What innovation types fit your cognitive
style? | WildeSpark Strategic Innovation Marketing Accelerators
is kinda boring. You could glance at Yahoo's home page and watch how they create post headlines to get
viewers to click. You might add a related video
or a related pic or two to get readers interested about what you've got to say.
Just my opinion, it could bring your website a little bit more interesting.

Thu, November 21, 2019 @ 9:50 AM

11. wrote:
Good information. Lucky me I ran across your site by accident (stumbleupon).

I have saved as a favorite for later!

Sat, November 30, 2019 @ 2:35 AM

12. wrote:
Awesome things here. I'm very happy to see your post. Thanks a lot
and I'm having a look forward to contact
you. Will you please drop me a mail?

Thu, December 5, 2019 @ 2:08 PM

13. wrote:
First of all I want to say superb blog! I had a quick question that
I'd like to ask if you don't mind. I was curious
to find out how you center yourself and clear your thoughts before writing.
I have had a hard time clearing my thoughts in getting my ideas out there.
I do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are wasted simply just trying to figure out how to begin. Any recommendations or hints?

Sun, December 15, 2019 @ 8:07 AM

14. wrote:
Heya just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the pictures
aren't loading properly. I'm not sure why but I think its a
linking issue. I've tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same results.

Mon, December 30, 2019 @ 2:33 AM

15. wrote:
Hello there, I discovered your site by way of Google
even as searching for a comparable topic, your web site got
here up, it appears great. I've bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

Hello there, simply was alert to your weblog via Google, and located that it is truly
informative. I'm going to be careful for brussels. I'll appreciate if you happen to continue this in future.
Numerous folks might be benefited from your writing.

Fri, January 24, 2020 @ 3:33 PM

Add a New Comment


Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.